Progress Software Corporation
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
|
|
Filed by the Registrant x |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy
Statement
x Definitive Proxy
Statement
o Definitive Additional
Materials
o Soliciting Material
Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12
|
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
Progress Software Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Progress Software Corporation
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o Fee computed on table
below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) Title of each
class of securities to which transaction applies:
2) Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
4) Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5) Total fee paid:
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule
and the date of its filing. |
1) Amount
Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule
or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
14 Oak Park
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of Progress Software Corporation (the Company) will
be held on Thursday, April 21, 2005, commencing at
10:00 A.M., local time, at the principal executive offices
of the Company, 14 Oak Park, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, for
the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
1. |
To fix the number of directors constituting the full Board of
Directors of the Company at six; |
|
|
2. |
To elect six directors; and |
|
|
3. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting and any adjournment thereof. |
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
February 25, 2005 as the record date for determination of
shareholders entitled to receive notice of and vote at the
meeting and any adjournment thereof.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
James D. Freedman |
|
Secretary |
March 21, 2005
YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. WHETHER OR
NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. A POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE IS
ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
14 Oak Park
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Progress Software
Corporation (the Company) of proxies for use at the
2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2005 Annual
Meeting) to be held on April 21, 2005, at
10:00 A.M., local time, at the principal executive offices
of the Company, 14 Oak Park, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730. It is
anticipated that this Proxy Statement and the accompanying form
of proxy will first be mailed to shareholders on or about
March 21, 2005.
At the 2005 Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will
be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
1. |
To fix the number of directors constituting the full Board of
Directors of the Company at six; and |
|
|
2. |
To elect six directors. |
The information contained in the Audit Committee
Report on pages 11 and 12, the Compensation
Committee Report on pages 14 and 15 and the Stock
Performance Graph on page 17 shall not be deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Commission) or subject to Regulations 14A
or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
VOTING PROCEDURES
Only holders of record of Common Stock outstanding at the close
of business on February 25, 2005 are entitled to vote at
the 2005 Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. As of that
date, there were 36,565,006 shares outstanding and entitled
to vote. Each outstanding share entitles the holder to one vote
on any proposal presented at the meeting. A list of the
shareholders entitled to notice of the 2005 Annual Meeting is
available for inspection by any shareholder at the
Companys principal office at the address above.
Any shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time
prior to its exercise at the 2005 Annual Meeting by giving
written notice of such revocation to the Secretary of the
Company, by signing and duly delivering a proxy bearing a later
date or by attending and voting in person at the 2005 Annual
Meeting. Duly executed proxies received and not revoked prior to
the meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions
indicated in the proxy. If no instructions are indicated, such
proxies will be voted FOR the proposal to fix the number of
directors constituting the full Board of Directors at six, FOR
the election of the nominees for director named in the proxy and
in the discretion of the proxies as to other matters that may
properly come before the 2005 Annual Meeting.
Votes withheld from any nominee for election as director,
abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as
present or represented at the meeting for purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the meeting.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other
nominee who holds shares for a beneficial owner withholds its
vote on a particular proposal with respect to which it does not
have discretionary voting power or instructions from the
beneficial owner. Abstentions and broker non-votes
with respect to a proposal are not included in calculating the
number of votes cast on the proposal and therefore do not have
the effect of voting against the proposal. An automated system
administered by the Companys transfer agent tabulates the
votes.
The Board of Directors of the Company knows of no other matters
to be presented at the meeting. If any other matter should be
presented at the meeting upon which a vote properly may be
taken, shares represented by all proxies received by the Board
of Directors will be voted in accordance with the judgment of
the persons named as proxies.
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be
participating in the practice of householding proxy
statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of
this proxy statement and the Companys 2004 annual report
may have been sent to multiple shareholders in a single
household. The Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of
either document to shareholders who so request by calling or
writing to the Company at the following address: Progress
Software Corporation, 14 Oak Park Drive, Bedford,
Massachusetts 01730, phone 781-280-4000 Attn: Investor Relations
or by submitting an email request to finance-info@progress.com.
Any shareholder who would like to receive separate copies of the
Companys annual report and proxy statement in the future,
or who would like to receive only one copy per household, should
contact his or her bank, broker or other nominee record holder,
or contact the Company at the above address, phone number or
email.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Companys by-laws provide for a Board of Directors, the
number of which shall be fixed from time to time by the
shareholders of the Company, and may be enlarged or reduced by
vote of a majority of the Board of Directors. Currently the
Board of Directors is comprised of six members. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has
recommended that the number of directors be fixed at six and has
nominated for election as directors Joseph W. Alsop, Larry R.
Harris, Roger J. Heinen, Jr., Michael L. Mark, Scott A.
McGregor and Amram Rasiel, each of whom is currently a director
of the Company. Each director elected at the 2005 Annual Meeting
will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders
or special meeting in lieu thereof and until his successor has
been duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death,
resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among
any of the executive officers or directors of the Company.
Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if
elected, and the Company has no reason to believe that any
nominee will be unable to serve. In the event that before the
2005 Annual Meeting one or more nominees should become unwilling
or unable to serve, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will
vote shares represented by any proxy received by the Board of
Directors for such other person or persons as may thereafter be
nominated for director by the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
If a quorum is present at the meeting, a majority of the votes
properly cast will be required to fix the number of directors at
six and a plurality of the votes properly cast will be required
to elect a nominee to the office of director.
2
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR
fixing the number of directors at six and FOR the election of
the six individuals named below as directors of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Age | |
|
Present Principal Employer and Recent Business Experience |
|
|
| |
|
|
Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Mr. Alsop, a Co-Founder of the Company, has been a director and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its inception in
1981. |
Larry R. Harris
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Mr. Harris has been a director of the Company since January
1995. Mr. Harris is a founder of EasyAsk, Inc, a software
maker of information retrieval solutions, and has been its
Chairman since 1996. |
Roger J. Heinen, Jr.
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Mr. Heinen has been a director of the Company since March 1999.
Mr. Heinen has since December 1997 been a Partner of
Flagship Ventures, a venture capital company. Mr. Heinen
formerly served as Senior Vice President, Developer Division,
Microsoft Corporation. Mr. Heinen is also a director of
ANSYS Inc. |
Michael L. Mark
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Mr. Mark has been a director of the Company since July 1987.
Mr. Mark is a private investor. |
Scott A. McGregor
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Mr. McGregor has been a director of the Company since March
1998. Mr. McGregor has since January 2005 been President
and CEO of Broadcom Corp. From 2002 to 2004 he was CEO of
Philips Semiconductors. From 1998 to 2001 he was Senior Vice
President and General Manager of Philips Electronics, North
America. |
Amram Rasiel
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Mr. Rasiel has been a director of the Company since April 1983.
Mr. Rasiel is a private investor. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors of the Company held five meetings during
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004. No director
attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of
the Board of Directors and of any committee of the Board of
Directors on which he served. There are three standing
committees of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee. Upon consideration of the requirements
regarding director independence set forth in Marketplace
Rules 4200 and 4350 of the The Nasdaq Stock Market, the
Board of Directors has determined that, with the exception of
Mr. Alsop, all members of the Board of Directors and that,
without exception, all members of the committees of the Board of
Directors are independent within the meaning of such rules.
The Audit Committee, of which Messrs. Heinen, Mark and
Rasiel are members, assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling
its oversight responsibilities relating to the financial
information which will be provided to shareholders and others,
the internal control system which management and the Board of
Directors have established, the independence and performance of
the independent registered public accounting firm and the audit
process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and
the Audit Committee continuously monitor developments related to
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and corporate governance
practices are updated accordingly. The Audit Committee held six
meetings during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.
Although the Board of Directors has not determined that any
member of the Audit Committee qualifies as a financial expert,
the Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee
member has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing
matters to discharge the responsibilities of the Committee, as
set forth in
3
its charter. The Audit Committee operates under a written
charter, which was recently amended by the Board of Directors. A
copy of the charter as amended, is attached as Appendix A
to this Proxy Statement. A copy of the amended charter can also
be found on the Companys website at
www.progress.com under the Corporate Governance page.
The Compensation Committee, of which Messrs. Heinen and
McGregor are members, held one meeting during the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2004. The Compensation Committee makes
recommendations concerning salaries and incentive compensation
for employees of the Company and determines the salaries and
incentive compensation for executive officers of the Company.
The Compensation Committee also administers the Companys
stock plans.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, of which
Messrs. Harris and Heinen are members, held one meeting
during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
identifying qualified candidates for election to the Board of
Directors and nominating the candidates proposed for election as
directors at the Annual Meeting. It also assists in determining
the composition of the board of directors and its committees, in
developing and monitoring a process to assess board
effectiveness and in developing and implementing the
Companys corporate governance guidelines. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written
charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which can
be found on the Companys website at
www.progress.com under the Corporate Governance page.
The Board of Directors has adopted a Finance Code of
Professional Ethics that applies to the Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and other
employees of the finance organization and a Code of Conduct that
applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Company.
Copies of the Code of Conduct and Finance Code of Professional
Ethics can be found on the Companys website at
www.progress.com under the Corporate Governance page.
The Company does not require members of the Board of Directors
to attend its annual meeting of shareholders. Other than
Mr. Alsop, no members of the Board of Directors attended
the 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.
The Board of Directors welcomes communications from the
Companys shareholders. Any shareholder may communicate
either with the Board as a whole, or with any individual
Director, by sending a written communication addressed to the
Board of Directors or to such Director, at the Companys
offices located at: 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730 or by
submitting an email communication to board@progress.com. All
communications sent to the Board of Directors will be forwarded
to the Board, as a whole, or to the individual director to whom
such communication was addressed.
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
Each of the Companys non-employee directors who rendered
services during fiscal 2004 were granted options to
purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the
Companys 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and has been
reimbursed, upon request, for expenses incurred in attending
Board of Directors meetings. In addition, each member of
the Audit Committee was awarded an additional grant of options
to purchase 4,000 shares. All other Committee members
were awarded a grant of options to
purchase 2,000 shares. Each of these options was
exercisable in full commencing on the date of grant. Each option
granted expires on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant
and has an exercise price equal to the closing price of the
Common Stock, as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market, National
Market System on the date of grant. Mr. Alsop who is an
employee of the Company is not paid any separate fees and does
not receive stock options for his service in the capacity of
director.
4
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN HOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the number of shares of the
Companys Common Stock beneficially owned by all persons
known by the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5%
of the Companys outstanding Common Stock, by each of the
Companys current directors, by each of the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing on
pages 8 and 9, and by all executive officers and directors
of the Company as a group, as of March 15, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Private Capital Management, L.P.(2)
|
|
|
3,895,538 |
|
|
|
10.65 |
% |
|
Bruce S. Sherman
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregg J. Powers
8889 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 500
Naples, FL 34108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, N.A.(3)
|
|
|
3,190,001 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
% |
|
111 Center Street
Little Rock, AR 72201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph W. Alsop(4)
|
|
|
2,841,159 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
14 Oak Park
Bedford, MA 01730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(5)
|
|
|
2,707,067 |
|
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
100 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amram Rasiel(6)
|
|
|
541,000 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
% |
David G. Ireland(7)
|
|
|
527,366 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Richard D. Reidy(8)
|
|
|
503,780 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
% |
Norman R. Robertson(9)
|
|
|
364,417 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Sliwkowski(10)
|
|
|
243,303 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael Mark(11)
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Scott A. McGregor(12)
|
|
|
131,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Roger J. Heinen, Jr.(13)
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Larry R Harris(14)
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All executive officers and directors as a group
(14 persons)(15)
|
|
|
5,773,385 |
|
|
|
14.05 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
All persons named in the table have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws
where applicable and subject to the other information contained
in the footnotes to this table. |
|
(2) |
Derived from Schedule 13G/ A filed February 13, 2005.
The persons named reported beneficial ownership of the following
shares: Private Capital Management, L.P. (3,895,538); Bruce S.
Sherman (3,922,688); and Gregg J. Powers (3,895,538).
Mr. Sherman is CEO of Private Capital Management
(PCM) and Mr. Powers is President of PCM. In
these capacities, Messrs. Sherman and Powers exercise
shared dispositive and shared voting power with respect to
shares held by PCMs clients and |
5
|
|
|
managed by PCM. Messrs. Sherman and Powers disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares held by PCMs clients
and disclaim the existence of a group. |
|
(3) |
Derived from Schedule 13G/ A filed February 17, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Includes 2,196,801 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Derived from Schedule 13G/ A dated February 11, 2005.
These securities are owned by various individual and
institutional investors which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
(Price Associates) serves as investment adviser with
power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the
securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price Associates is deemed to
be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price
Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the
beneficial owner of such securities. |
|
(6) |
Includes 71,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Includes 510,720 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(8) |
Includes 503,241 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(9) |
Includes 358,715 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 240,709 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(11) |
Includes 71,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(12) |
Includes 119,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(13) |
Includes 66,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(14) |
Includes 55,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(15) |
Includes 4,534,502 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
6
Information related to securities authorized for issuance under
equity compensation plans as of November 30, 2004 is as
follows:
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Securities to be | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
Issued Upon | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Remaining | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Available | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Options, | |
|
For | |
|
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Warrants and | |
|
Future | |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights | |
|
Rights | |
|
Issuance | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
|
|
7,397 |
|
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
17.33 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,446 |
|
|
$ |
14.77 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has adopted two equity compensation plans, the 2002
Nonqualified Stock Plan (2002 Plan) and the 2004 Inducement
Stock Plan (2004 Plan), for which the approval of shareholders
was not required. The Company intends that the 2004 Plan be
reserved for persons to whom the Company may issue securities
without shareholder approval as an inducement to become employed
by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Nasdaq Stock Market. Executive officers and members of the Board
of Directors are not eligible for awards under the 2002 Plan. An
executive officer or director would be eligible to receive an
award under the 2004 Plan only as an inducement to join the
Company. Awards under the 2002 Plan and the 2004 Plan may
include nonqualified stock options, grants of conditioned stock,
unrestricted grants of stock, grants of stock contingent upon
the attainment of performance goals and stock appreciation
rights. No awards other than nonqualified stock options have
been granted under either plan. A total of 6,700,000 shares
are issuable under the two plans.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Companys directors and executive officers,
and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class
of the Companys equity securities, to file reports of
ownership of, and transactions in, the Companys securities
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information is
also filed with The Nasdaq Stock Market. Such directors,
executive officers and ten-percent shareholders are also
required to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms received by
it, and on written representations from certain reporting
persons, the Company believes that with respect to the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2004, its directors, officers and
ten-percent shareholders complied with all applicable
Section 16(a) filing requirements.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During the 2004 fiscal year, the Company did not engage in any
transaction or series of similar transactions in which the
amount involved exceeded or exceeds $60,000 and in which any of
our directors or executive officers, any holder of more than 5%
of any class of our voting securities or any member of the
immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will
have a direct or indirect material interest, nor was
7
any director or executive officers or any of their family
members indebted to us or any of our subsidiaries in any amount
in excess of $60,000 at any time during the 2004 fiscal year.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation
earned by (i) the Companys Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and (ii) the Companys four most highly
compensated executive officers other than the CEO during the
2004 fiscal year (collectively, the Named Executive
Officers), for services rendered in fiscal 2004, 2003 and
2002.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
Compensation | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary($) | |
|
Bonus($) | |
|
(#)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
302,250 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
44,984 |
|
|
Co-Founder and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
351,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
41,177 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,944 |
|
David G. Ireland
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
303,500 |
|
|
$ |
217,581 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,172 |
|
|
President, Progress OpenEdge |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
233,100 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
297,499 |
|
|
$ |
163,353 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
Richard D. Reidy
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
253,333 |
|
|
$ |
150,462 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,539 |
|
|
President, DataDirect |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
179,280 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,141 |
|
|
Technologies |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
246,666 |
|
|
$ |
131,204 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,482 |
|
Norman R. Robertson
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
252,916 |
|
|
$ |
158,439 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
179,280 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
26,467 |
|
|
Finance and Administration |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
245,792 |
|
|
$ |
130,808 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,798 |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Sliwkowski
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
$ |
169,965 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,913 |
|
|
President, ObjectStore |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
$ |
129,870 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,800 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,356 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company did not make any restricted stock awards, grant any
stock appreciation rights or make any long-term incentive plan
payouts during fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002. |
|
(2) |
The amounts disclosed in this column include: |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Company contributions for fiscal 2004 of $12,300 to a defined
contribution plan, the Progress Software Corporation 401(k) Plan
(the 401(k) Plan) for each of the Named Executive
Officers. |
|
(b) |
|
Payments by the Company for fiscal 2004 401(k) Plan matching
contributions in excess of participation limits imposed on
higher-paid individuals under federal tax law, as follows:
Mr. Alsop, $29,760; Mr. Ireland, $19,911;
Mr. Reidy, $13,669; Mr. Robertson, $13,644; and
Mr. Sliwkowski, $8,392. |
|
(c) |
|
Payments by the Company in fiscal 2004 of elected taxable long
term disability insurance premiums for the benefit of the
following executive officers: Mr. Alsop, $1,194;
Mr. Ireland, $1,127; Mr. Reidy, $939;
Mr. Robertson, $939; and Mr. Sliwkowski, $803. |
8
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Imputed income in fiscal 2004 of term life insurance premiums
for the benefit of the following executive officers:
Mr. Alsop, $1,730; Mr. Ireland, $1,834;
Mr. Reidy, $631; Mr. Robertson, $1,834; and Mr
Sliwkowski, $418. |
|
(e) |
|
Company contributions for fiscal 2003 to the 401(k) Plan of
$12,480 for each of the Named Executive Officers. |
|
(f) |
|
Payments by the Company for fiscal 2003 401(k) Plan matching
contributions in excess of participation limits imposed on
higher-paid individuals under federal tax law, as follows:
Mr. Alsop, $25,584; Mr. Ireland, $16,433;
Mr. Reidy, $11,307; Mr. Robertson, $11,282; and
Mr. Sliwkowski, $6,602. |
|
(g) |
|
Payments by the Company in fiscal 2003 of elected taxable long
term disability insurance premiums for the benefit of the
following executive officers: Mr. Alsop, $1,308;
Mr. Ireland, $1,121; Mr. Reidy, $934;
Mr. Robertson, $1,771; and Mr. Sliwkowski, $838. |
|
(h) |
|
Imputed income in fiscal 2003 of term life insurance premiums
for the benefit of the following executive officers:
Mr. Alsop, $1,805; Mr. Ireland, $1,805;
Mr. Reidy, $420; Mr. Robertson, $981; and
Mr. Sliwkowski, $378. |
|
(i) |
|
Company contributions for fiscal 2002 to the 401(k) Plan of
$11,000 for each of the Named Executive Officers. |
|
(j) |
|
Payments by the Company for fiscal 2002 401(k) Plan matching
contributions in excess of participation limits imposed on
higher-paid individuals under federal tax law, as follows:
Mr. Alsop, $19,164; Mr. Ireland, $12,961;
Mr. Reidy, $8,055; Mr. Robertson, $7,842; and
Mr. Sliwkowski, $4,978. |
|
(k) |
|
Payments by the Company in fiscal 2002 of elected taxable long
term disability insurance premiums for the benefit of the
following executive officers: Mr. Alsop, $975; and
Mr. Robertson, $975. |
|
(l) |
|
Imputed income in fiscal 2002 of term life insurance premiums
for the benefit of the following executive officers:
Mr. Alsop, $1,805; Mr. Ireland, $1,834;
Mr. Reidy, $427; Mr. Robertson, $981; and
Mr. Sliwkowski, $378. |
9
OPTION/ SAR GRANTS IN FISCAL 2004
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the grant of stock options in fiscal year 2004 to each of the
Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential | |
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
Realizable Value at | |
|
|
| |
|
Assumed Annual | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
Rates of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
|
|
Appreciation for | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Option Term(5) | |
|
|
Options/SARs | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted(#) | |
|
Fiscal Year(3) | |
|
($/Share)(4) | |
|
Date | |
|
5%($) | |
|
10%($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
|
75,000 |
(1) |
|
|
3.04% |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
|
5/23/14 |
|
|
$ |
906,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,212 |
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
(2) |
|
|
5.07% |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
9/26/14 |
|
|
$ |
1,513,278 |
|
|
$ |
3,834,943 |
|
David G. Ireland
|
|
|
50,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2.03% |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
|
5/23/14 |
|
|
$ |
604,521 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,141 |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2.03% |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
9/26/14 |
|
|
$ |
605,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,533,977 |
|
Richard D. Reidy
|
|
|
35,000 |
(1) |
|
|
1.42% |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
|
5/23/14 |
|
|
$ |
423,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,050,099 |
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1.42% |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
9/26/14 |
|
|
$ |
423,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,073,784 |
|
Norman R. Robertson
|
|
|
35,000 |
(1) |
|
|
1.42% |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
|
5/23/14 |
|
|
$ |
423,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,050,099 |
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1.42% |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
9/26/14 |
|
|
$ |
423,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,073,784 |
|
Peter J. Sliwkowski
|
|
|
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
1.01% |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
|
5/23/14 |
|
|
$ |
302,261 |
|
|
$ |
750,071 |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1.01% |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
9/26/14 |
|
|
$ |
302,655 |
|
|
$ |
766,989 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options vest on the date of grant with respect to 5% of the
total amount, thereafter in equal monthly installments over a
57-month period commencing on June 1, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Options vest on the date of grant with respect to 12% of the
total amount, thereafter in equal monthly installments over a
53-month period commencing on October 1, 2004. |
|
(3) |
The Company granted options to purchase a total of
2,465,984 shares of Common Stock to employees in fiscal
2004. The Company granted no SARs during fiscal 2004. |
|
(4) |
All options were granted at fair market value, which was
determined by the Compensation Committee to be the closing price
of the Common Stock on the date of grant, as reported by The
Nasdaq Stock Market, National Market System. |
|
(5) |
The amounts shown represent hypothetical values that could be
achieved for the respective options if exercised at the end of
their option terms. These gains are based on assumed rates of
stock appreciation of 5% and 10%, compounded annually from the
date the respective options were granted to the date of their
expiration. The gains shown are net of the option price, but do
not include deductions for taxes or other expenses that may be
associated with the exercise. Actual gains, if any, on stock
option exercises will depend on future performance of the Common
Stock, the optionholders continued employment through the
option period, and the date on which the options are exercised. |
10
AGGREGATED OPTION/ SAR EXERCISES IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/ SAR VALUES
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to option exercises in fiscal 2004 and the value of unexercised
options, as of November 30, 2004, for each of the Named
Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Value of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying | |
|
Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs at | |
|
Options/SARs at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End(#)(1) | |
|
Fiscal Year-End($)(1)(2) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shares Acquired | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
Name |
|
On Exercise(#) | |
|
Realized($) | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,622,040 |
|
|
|
2,149,301/519,999 |
|
|
$ |
27,813,218/$3,183,174 |
|
David G. Ireland
|
|
|
33,182 |
|
|
$ |
436,861 |
|
|
|
450,020/293,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,843,445/$1,837,570 |
|
Richard D. Reidy
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
353,441 |
|
|
|
460,715/211,563 |
|
|
$ |
4,922,913/$1,398,192 |
|
Norman R. Robertson
|
|
|
18,058 |
|
|
$ |
235,911 |
|
|
|
317,715/198,499 |
|
|
$ |
2,681,042/$1,236,745 |
|
Peter J. Sliwkowski
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
114,440 |
|
|
|
231,709/153,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,869,657/$ 987,712 |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of November 30, 2004 the Company had issued no SARs. |
|
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of an assumed value of $22.83 per
share, which was the average of the high and the low sale prices
of the Companys Common Stock on November 28, 2004, as
reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market, less the applicable
exercise price. |
EMPLOYEE RETENTION AND MOTIVATION AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into an agreement (an Employee
Retention and Motivation Agreement) with each of the Named
Executive Officers (Covered Persons). Each Employee
Retention and Motivation Agreement provides for certain payments
and benefits upon a Change in Control (as defined in such
agreement) of the Company and upon an Involuntary Termination
(as defined in such agreement) of the Covered Persons
employment by the Company. Upon a Change in Control, the final
twelve-month vesting portion of each outstanding unvested option
grant held by the Covered Persons shall automatically become
vested and each Covered Persons annual cash bonus award
shall be fixed and guaranteed at his respective target level.
Payment of such bonus will immediately occur on a pro-rata basis
with respect to the elapsed part of the relevant fiscal year and
the balance of such bonus will be paid at the end of such fiscal
year or immediately upon Involuntary Termination of such Covered
Person if such event occurs prior to the end of the relevant
fiscal year. Upon Involuntary Termination of a Covered Person,
the final twelve-month vesting portion of each outstanding
unvested option grant held by such Covered Person shall
automatically become vested. If such Involuntary Termination
occurs within six months following a Change in Control then the
Covered Person shall receive a lump sum payment equal to nine
months of target compensation and such Covered Persons
benefits shall continue for nine months. If such Involuntary
Termination occurs after six months but prior to twelve months
following a Change in Control then the Covered Person shall
receive a lump sum payment equal to six months of target
compensation and such Covered Persons benefits shall
continue for six months.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee
assists the Board of Directors (the Board) in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the
financial information which will be provided to the
11
shareholders and others, the internal control system which
management and the Board have established, the independence and
performance of the independent registered public accounting firm
and the audit process. Each member of the Audit Committee is
independent as defined by the Nasdaq Stock Markets listing
standards. The Audit Committee charter, as amended and adopted
by the Board, is included in this Proxy Statement as
Appendix A.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal controls over financial reporting to ensure
the integrity of the Companys financial statements. The
Companys independent registered public accounting firm,
Deloitte & Touche LLP, is responsible for performing an
audit of managements assessment and effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting in
conjunction with an audit of the consolidated financial
statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)
and issuing opinions on the financial statements and
managements assessment and effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has met
and held discussions with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm regarding the attestation of
internal control over financial reporting and the financial
audit process of the Company.
The Audit Committee obtained from Deloitte & Touche LLP
the written disclosures and letter required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees. The Audit Committee and
Deloitte & Touche LLP have discussed such disclosures
and letter, as well as the independence of Deloitte &
Touche LLP.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2004 with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm. Management has
represented to the Audit Committee that the financial statements
were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with
Deloitte & Touche LLP the communications required by
standards established by the PCAOB (United States), including
those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, and
discussed the results of the independent registered public
accounting firms examination of the financial statements.
Based on the above-mentioned reviews and discussions with
management and the independent registered public accounting
firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements be
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2004, for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
Michael L. Mark, Chairman |
|
Roger J. Heinen, Jr. |
|
Amram Rasiel |
12
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES
Aggregate fees billed to the Company for services performed for
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 and
November 30, 2003 by the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche
LLP, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 | |
|
Fiscal 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
1,364,000 |
|
|
$ |
577,000 |
|
Tax Fee(2)
|
|
$ |
722,000 |
|
|
$ |
544,000 |
|
Audit Related Fees(3)
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes statutory audit fees related to the Companys
wholly owned foreign subsidiaries as the results of these audits
are utilized in the audit of the consolidated financial
statements. Audit fees during 2004 also include fees relating to
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002 amounting to approximately $658,000 or 48% of the audit
fees. In accordance with the policy on audit committee
pre-approval, 100% of audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm are pre-approved. |
|
(2) |
Includes fees primarily for tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning (domestic and international). In accordance with the
policy on audit committee pre-approval, 100% of tax services
provided by the independent registered public accounting firm
are pre-approved. |
|
(3) |
Includes fees related to the performance of audits and attest
services not required by statute or regulations, due diligence
related to mergers, acquisitions, proposed transactions, and
accounting consultations regarding the application of generally
accepted accounting principles to proposed transactions. In
accordance with the policy on audit committee pre-approval, 100%
of audit related services provided by the independent registered
public accounting firm are pre-approved. |
POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND
PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting
compensation, and overseeing the work of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit
Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all
audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the
independent registered public accounting firm.
Requests for specific services by the independent registered
public accounting firm which comply with the auditor services
policy are reviewed by the Companys Finance, Tax, and
Internal Audit departments. Requests approved by the group are
aggregated and submitted to the Audit Committee in one of the
following ways:
(1) Request for approval of services at a meeting of the
Audit Committee; or (2) Request for approval of services by
Mr. Mark, Chairman of the Audit Committee and then the
approval by the full committee at the next meeting of the Audit
Committee.
The request may be made with respect to either specific services
or a type of service for predictable or recurring services.
13
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
The current members of the Compensation Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors are Messrs. Heinen and
McGregor. Neither of them is or has ever been an officer or
employee of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries. No member
of the Compensation Committee is a party to any relationship
required to be disclosed under Item 402 or Item 404 of
Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Companys executive compensation program is established
by the Compensation Committee.
The Companys executive compensation
philosophy. The Companys philosophy is to reward
executives based upon corporate and individual performance as
well as to provide long-term incentives for the achievement of
future financial and strategic goals, thereby advancing both the
short and long term interests of shareholders. These goals
include growth of the Company, defined primarily in terms of
growth in revenue and earnings per share. It is also the
Companys philosophy to base a significant portion of the
executives total compensation opportunity on performance
incentives consistent with the scope and level of the
executives responsibilities.
Elements of executive compensation program. The
executive compensation program for fiscal 2004 consisted of the
following three elements: (1) base salary;
(2) incentive compensation in the form of annual cash bonus
awards earned under the Companys Fiscal 2004 Bonus
Programs for Executives and Key Contributors (the 2004
Bonus Programs); and (3) equity-based long-term
incentive compensation in the form of stock options. The
Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation
should be aligned with long-term shareholder value. Therefore,
the elements of the executive compensation program are weighted
such that the equity-based long-term element is potentially the
most rewarding element. All elements of the executive
compensation program are designed to be competitive with those
of comparable technology companies.
Cash Compensation. Total cash compensation is
comprised of base salary and annual bonus. Base salary increases
for fiscal 2004 were based upon individual, business unit or
departmental contribution and performance. The 2004 Bonus
Programs were established by the Compensation Committee and
approved by the Board of Directors. For each participant, the
2004 Bonus Programs provided for a specified payment as a
percentage of base salary depending on the attainment of
specific operating metrics of the Companys various
business units, primarily focused on revenue growth and
operating profit. The targets for the operating metrics are
approved by the Board of Directors. If the Company or relevant
business unit achieves 100% of its targeted operating metrics,
100% of the specified bonus is paid. More or less than 100% of
the specified bonus may be paid depending on the Companys
level of achievement and the Compensation Committees
assessment of the Companys strength, stability and
strategic position, as well as individual contribution. A
further explanation of the elements of the executive
compensation program as they relate to the CEO is provided below.
Cash Compensation of Chief Executive Officer.
Total cash compensation received by Mr. Alsop decreased for
fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003 by 7%.
Mr. Alsops decrease in fiscal 2004 total cash
compensation was due to partial non-attainment of targeted
revenue growth and operating profit and therefore a lower payout
of cash bonus. Base salary for Mr. Alsop remained the same
during fiscal year 2004 as compared to fiscal year 2003.
Equity Compensation. Long-term incentive
compensation, in the form of stock options, is intended to
correlate executive compensation with the Companys
long-term success as measured by the Companys stock price.
Stock options are tied to the future success of the Company
because options granted have an exercise
14
price equal to the closing market value at the date of the grant
and will only provide value to the extent that the price of the
Companys stock increases above the exercise price. Since
options granted generally vest monthly over a five-year period,
option participants are encouraged to continue employment with
the Company. Based on the foregoing considerations, during
fiscal 2004, Mr. Alsop and the other Named Executive
Officers received grants of stock options as disclosed in the
Option Grant Table on page 10.
Benefits. All employees who participated in the
401(k) Plan received a discretionary matching contribution for
fiscal 2004, representing up to 6% of each eligible
employees calendar year compensation, including base
salary, commissions and bonus, depending on the employees
length of service with the Company and the employees
contribution level. Such matching contribution was approved by
the Compensation Committee. The Named Executive Officers also
received such a contribution, except that, due to limitations
imposed on 401(k) matching contributions to higher-paid
individuals under federal tax law, a portion of the
contributions that otherwise would have been received by
Mr. Alsop and the other Named Executive Officers disclosed
in the Summary Compensation Table, pursuant to the 401(k) Plan
were instead paid directly to such individuals. All such amounts
are disclosed under Other Compensation in the
Summary Compensation Table on page 8. The Companys
health and insurance plans are the same for all employees. The
Companys stock purchase plan is available to all employees
except Mr. Alsop, who is ineligible to participate in the
plan due to his percentage of ownership of the Company.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code) imposes an annual limit of
$1,000,000 on tax deductions that an employer may claim for
compensation of certain executives. Section 162(m) of the
Code provides exceptions to the deduction limitation for
performance-based compensation, and it is the intent
of the Compensation Committee to take advantage of such
exceptions to the extent feasible and in the best interests of
the Company.
|
|
|
Roger J. Heinen, Jr. |
|
Scott A. McGregor |
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
In 2003, the Board of Directors formed a Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, composed of Messrs. Harris
and Heinen, each of whom meets the independence requirements for
nominating committee members set forth in the rules of The
Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee is responsible for identifying qualified candidates
for election to the Board of Directors and nominating the
candidates proposed for election as directors at the Annual
Meeting.
In selecting director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee seeks candidates who have the highest
personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated
exceptional ability and judgment and who will be effective, in
conjunction with the other nominees to the board, in
collectively serving the long-term interests of the
shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
has established the following minimum requirements: having at
least five years of business experience, having no identified
conflicts of interest as a prospective director of the Company,
having not been convicted in a criminal proceeding aside from
traffic violations during the five years prior to the date of
selection, and being willing to comply with the Companys
Code of Conduct and Finance Code of Professional Ethics. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the right
to modify these minimum qualifications from time to time.
Exceptional candidates who do not meet all of these criteria may
still be considered.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the
qualifications and backgrounds of the directors, as well as the
overall composition of the Board, and nominates candidates for
election at the annual meeting of shareholders. In the case of
incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the
15
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews each such
directors overall past service to the Company, including
the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality
of performance, and whether the director continues to meet
applicable independence standards. In the case of a new director
candidate, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
determines whether the candidate meets the applicable
independence standards, and the level of the candidates
financial expertise. The candidate will also be interviewed by
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Qualified
candidates for membership on the Board will be considered
without regard to race, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national
origin or disability. To date, no third parties have been
compensated for assisting in identifying or evaluating potential
nominees.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
Director candidates recommended by shareholders, and does not
alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on
whether or not the candidate was recommended by a shareholder.
Shareholders may recommend Director candidates for consideration
by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by sending
a written communication to the committee at the Companys
offices located at: 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730.
Recommendations sent by shareholders must provide the
candidates name, biographical data and qualifications
including age, five-year employment history with employer names
and a description of the employers business, whether such
individual can read and understand fundamental financial
statements, other board memberships (if any), and such other
information as reasonably available and sufficient to enable the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to evaluate the
minimum qualifications stated above. The submission must be
accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for
election if nominated by the Board of Directors and to serve if
elected by the shareholders. Shareholder recommendations of
candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting of
shareholders must be given at least 90 days prior to the
date of the next annual meeting of shareholders.
16
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph compares the Companys cumulative
shareholder return with that of a broad market index (NASDAQ
Stock Market Index for U.S. Companies) and a published
industry index (NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing Services
Stocks). Each of these indices is calculated assuming that $100
was invested on November 30, 1999.
Comparative 5-Year Cumulative Total Return
Among Progress Software Corporation, Nasdaq Stock Market
Index
and Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Services Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
11/99 | |
|
11/00 | |
|
11/01 | |
|
11/02 | |
|
11/03 | |
|
11/04 | |
| |
Progress Software Corporation
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.)
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected the
firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, to serve as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year ending November 30, 2005. The Company has been advised
that a representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be
present at the 2005 Annual Meeting. This representative will
have the opportunity to make a statement if he desires and will
be available to respond to appropriate questions presented at
the meeting.
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION
The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company
and in addition to soliciting shareholders by mail, the Company
will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their
17
reasonable out-of-pocket costs in forwarding proxy materials to
the beneficial owners of shares held of record by them.
Directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may,
without additional compensation, solicit shareholders in person
or by mail, telephone, facsimile, or otherwise following the
original solicitation.
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS FOR 2006 ANNUAL MEETING
The Company anticipates that its 2006 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders will be held on or about April 20, 2006.
Proposals of shareholders of the Company intended to be
presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting must, in order to be
included in the Companys Proxy Statement and the form of
proxy for the 2006 Annual Meeting, be received at the
Companys principal executive offices by November 21,
2005.
Under the by-laws of the Company, any shareholder intending to
present any proposal (other than a proposal made by, or at the
direction of, the Board of Directors of the Company) at the 2006
Annual Meeting, must give written notice of such proposal
(including certain information about any nominee or matter
proposed and the proposing shareholder) to the Secretary of the
Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days
prior to the date of the scheduled annual meeting; provided,
however, that if less than 70 days notice or prior
public disclosure of the scheduled annual meeting is given or
made, such notice, to be timely, must be given within
10 days following such public disclosure or mailing of such
notice, whichever is earlier.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Shareholders of record on February 25, 2005 will receive
with this Proxy Statement a copy of the Companys 2004
Annual Report on Form 10-K, containing detailed financial
information concerning the Company. The Companys 2004
Annual Report filed on Form 10-K is also available on-line
from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions
EDGAR database at the following address:
www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/srch-edgar?progress+software.
18
Appendix A
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
Purpose and Authority
The Audit Committee is a committee of the Board of Directors.
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the
Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
relating to the integrity of the financial information which
will be provided to the shareholders and others. Additionally,
the Audit Committee will assist the Board of Directors in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in regards to the
Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The Audit Committee shall be solely and directly responsible for
appointing, evaluating, compensating, retaining, and when
necessary, terminating the engagement of the independent
auditors.
The Audit Committee shall have the authority to engage outside
counsel and other advisors as it determines necessary to carry
out its duties. The Company will provide appropriate funding to
the Audit Committee for the payment of compensation of any such
advisors and the compensation of the independent auditor
selected by the Committee. In addition, the Company will provide
funding for the ordinary administrative expenses of the
Committee, which are necessary or appropriate in carrying out
its duties. The Audit Committee may conduct or authorize
investigations into any matters within the scope of its
responsibilities and may meet with any employee of the Company
or any third parties it deems necessary in connection with such
investigations.
Composition
The membership of the Audit Committee shall consist of at least
three directors who are independent of the management of the
Company and meet the independence requirements of applicable
laws and regulations and of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Members of the Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board
of Directors and may be removed by the Board of Directors.
All members shall be financially literate. At least one member
shall have past employment experience in finance or accounting,
requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other
comparable experience or background which results in the
individuals financial sophistication, including being or
having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer
or other senior officer with financial oversight
responsibilities.
Meetings
The Audit Committee shall hold regularly scheduled meetings and
special meetings as circumstances require. As part of the
process to foster open communication, the Audit Committee shall
meet periodically with management, the independent auditors and
internal audit in separate executive sessions to discuss any
matters that the Committee or each of these groups believe
should be discussed privately
Responsibilities
To assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Audit Committee will:
|
|
|
1. Provide an open avenue of communication among the
independent auditors, financial and senior management, internal
audit, legal counsel and the Board of Directors. |
|
|
2. Review and select the independent auditors to audit the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. The Audit
Committee has direct and sole responsibility for the oversight
of the independent |
A-1
|
|
|
auditors, including the resolution of disagreements between
management and the independent auditors regarding financial
reporting matters. |
|
|
3. Review annually the qualifications and performance of
the independent auditors and make determinations regarding any
discharge of the independent auditors when circumstances warrant. |
|
|
4. Evaluate annually the independence of the independent
auditors based on the receipt from the independent auditor of a
formal, written statement describing all relationships between
the independent auditors and the Company in accordance with
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1. |
|
|
5. Discuss with the independent auditor any disclosed
relationships or services that may impact the independence and
objectivity of the auditor and, if needed, take, or recommend
that the Board of Directors take, the appropriate action to
oversee and satisfy itself as to the auditors independence. |
|
|
6. Oversee the rotation of the lead audit partner having
primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner
responsible for reviewing the audit as required by applicable
law or regulation. |
|
|
7. Review and pre-approve all audit services and
permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent
auditors. The Audit Committee may, from time to time, delegate
its authority to approve services on a preliminary basis to the
Audit Committee Chairman, provided that any such approvals are
presented to the full Audit Committee at the next Committee
meeting. |
|
|
8. Review and discuss with the independent auditors the
scope, staffing and planning for the annual audit process. |
|
|
9. Review with the independent auditors any problems or
difficulties the auditor may have encountered in the course of
the audit work, including any restrictions on scope or
activities or access to required information, and any
disagreements with management. |
|
|
10. Review with the independent auditors, the
Companys internal audit and financial management, the
adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls over
financial reporting. Elicit any recommendations for the
improvement of such internal control procedures or particular
areas where new or more detailed controls or procedures are
desirable. |
|
|
11. Review with the General Counsel legal matters that may
have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements, the Companys compliance policies and any
material reports or inquiries received from regulators or
government agencies. |
|
|
12. Review the Companys policies and procedures
regarding compliance with applicable laws and regulations and
with the Companys Code of Conduct. |
|
|
13. Establish and review periodically procedures for the
receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the
Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters; and the confidential, anonymous submission by
employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters. |
|
|
14. Act as the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee (QLCC),
reviewing and discussing any reports received from attorneys
regarding securities law violations, breaches of fiduciary
duties or similar violations which were reported to the General
Counsel or the Chief Executive Officer and not resolved to the
satisfaction of the reporting attorney. |
|
|
15. Review and approve all related party transactions (as
defined by the rules issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission) on an on-going basis. |
|
|
16. Review and discuss with management the Companys
major financial risks and the steps management has taken to
monitor and control such risks. |
|
|
17. Review and discuss with management and the independent
auditors the annual audited financial statements and the
quarterly financial statements including Managements
Discussion and Analysis of |
A-2
|
|
|
Financial Condition and Results of Operations prior to the
filing of reports containing such financial statements with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
18. Discuss the results of the annual audit and quarterly
review and any matters required to be communicated to the
Committee by the independent auditors under generally accepted
auditing standards including the independent auditors
judgment about the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
Companys accounting principles used in financial
reporting. Based on the review performed, recommend to the Board
of Directors whether the audited financial statements be
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
|
19. Review and discuss reports from the independent
auditors on all critical accounting policies and practices to be
used in the Companys financial statements; all alternative
treatments of financial information within generally accepted
accounting principles that have been discussed with management,
ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and
treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent
auditors; and other material written communications between the
independent auditors and management, such as any management
letter or schedule of unadjusted differences. |
|
|
20. Discuss with management the Companys earning
announcements as well as financial information and earnings
guidance prior to public release. |
|
|
21. Review with management and the independent auditors the
effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives and unusual or
infrequently occurring transactions, as well as off-balance
sheet structures, on the financial statements. |
|
|
22. Review disclosures made to the Audit Committee by the
Companys Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive
Officer during the certification process for each Form 10-K
and Form 10-Q concerning any significant deficiencies in
the design or operation of internal controls or material
weaknesses and any fraud involving management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal
controls. The Audit Committee shall direct the actions to be
taken or make recommendations to the Board of Directors of
actions to be taken, in the event such disclosures indicate the
finding of any significant deficiencies in internal controls or
fraud. |
|
|
23. Issue the report required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission to be included in the Companys annual
proxy statement. |
|
|
24. Review the performance of the internal audit function
including the departments objectivity and authority of its
reporting obligations, the proposed audit plans for the coming
year, the coordination of such plans with the independent
auditors and the results of internal audits. The Audit Committee
shall be directly responsible for appointing, evaluating,
compensating, retaining, and when necessary, terminating the
lead internal auditor. |
|
|
25. Review and assess the adequacy of the Committees
Charter annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board
of Directors. |
|
|
26. Perform any other duties assigned to the Audit
Committee by the Board of Directors, or as may be required by
law or regulation. |
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers
set forth in the Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit
Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the
Companys financial statements are in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The financial
statements are the responsibility of management. Expressing an
opinion on the financial statements based on the audits
performed is the responsibility of the independent auditors.
A-3
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
April 21, 2005
Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
ê Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. ê
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSAL 2.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE þ
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THIS PROXY ON THE OTHER SIDE
AND MAIL IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE TO ENSURE
REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES. NO POSTAGE NEED BE AFFIXED IF
MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME(S)
APPEAR(S) ON STOCK CERTIFICATE. IF SHAREHOLDER IS A
CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, PLEASE HAVE AN AUTHORIZED
OFFICER SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
1.
|
|
To fix the number of directors
constituting the full Board of
Directors of the Company at six.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
2. |
Election of Directors. |
o |
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
o |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
o |
FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below) |
NOMINEES
o Joseph W. Alsop
o Larry R. Harris
o Roger J. Heinen, Jr.
o Michael L. Mark
o Scott A. McGregor
o Amram Rasiel
INSTRUCTION:To
withhold authority
to vote for any
individual
nominee(s), mark
FOR ALL EXCEPT and
fill in the circle
next to each nominee
you wish to
withhold, as shown
here: þ
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS
DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, IT WILL BE VOTED FOR THE
PROPOSALS SET FORTH ABOVE.
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please
check the box at right and indicate your new address
in the address space above. Please note that
changes to the registered name(s) on the account may
not be submitted via this method.
|
|
o |
|
|
|
Mark box at right if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting.
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder |
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder |
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
Note: |
This proxy must be signed exactly as the name appears hereon. When shares are held jointly,
each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person. |
Dear Shareholder:
Please take note of the important information enclosed with this Proxy Ballot. There are a number
of issues related to the management and operation of your Company that require your immediate
attention and approval. These are discussed in detail in the enclosed proxy materials.
Your vote counts, and you are
strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.
Please mark the boxes on this proxy card to indicate how your shares will be voted. Then sign the
card, detach it and return your proxy vote in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
Your vote must be received
prior to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, April 21, 2005.
Thank you
in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters.
Sincerely,
Progress Software Corporation
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
14 OAK PARK, BEDFORD MASSACHUSETTS 01730
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS APRIL 21, 2005
The undersigned shareholder of Progress Software Corporation, revoking all prior proxies,
hereby appoints Joseph W. Alsop, Norman R. Robertson and Robert L. Birnbaum, or any of them acting
singly, proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of Common Stock of Progress
Software Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company to be held at the Companys office at 14 Oak Park, Bedford,
Massachusetts on April 21, 2005, at 10:00 A.M., local time, and at any adjournments thereof, upon
matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated March 21, 2005, a copy
of which has been received by the undersigned, and in their discretion, upon any other business
that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. A SHAREHOLDER WISHING TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NEED ONLY SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Attendance of the undersigned at the meeting or any adjourned session
thereof will not be deemed to revoke the proxy unless the undersigned shall affirmatively indicate
the intention of the undersigned to vote the shares represented hereby in person.
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)